By Sarah Cline
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
BATON ROUGE — A court order that keeps Louisiana authorities from enforcing a ban on most abortions remained in effect Monday after a judge asked for more information from both sides in a lawsuit over the state’s “trigger law.”
State District Judge Donald Johnson said both sides have until Tuesday morning to submit their “proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law” in the case. Johnson is pondering whether to allow enforcement of the abortion ban that was written in anticipation of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the 1973 decision that established abortion rights. That decision came June 24 and abortion access in Louisiana has been flickering ever since with a series of on-again-off-again court rulings.
In the meantime, Johnson said the temporary restraining order blocking enforcement of the ban — allowing clinics to continue abortion procedures — will remain in effect until his ruling. Lawyers representing Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said they expect a written ruling within the coming days. However, Landry said he also anticipates that the case will ultimately end up before the Louisiana Supreme Court.
“We believe that ultimately we will prevail and the rule of law will be upheld,” Landry said during a news conference, that was mostly drowned out by the chants of nearby protesters, following Monday’s court hearing. “Those people who don’t like it have two choices — they can try to change the law, but if they find themselves in the minority of ideas then they can pack their bags and go somewhere else.”
The Baton Rouge hearing is among the latest developments in state and federal legal battles around the country, prompted by the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Roe v. Wade decision. In another Monday development, the Supreme Court issued an order that put Indiana a step closer to being able to enforce a parental notification law involving girls who get abortions before they turn 18.
The law has been blocked for five years, but the Supreme Court ordered lower courts to take a new look at the law following the landmark June 24 decision. The order formally returned the Indiana case to lower courts that had refused to act while awaiting the judgement.
Abortion remains legal in Indiana up to about 20 weeks.
In Louisiana, there is little question that an abortion ban will eventually be in effect in the state where the Legislature has long been dominated by abortion opponents. The question as the lawsuit there progresses is when. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit — a north Louisiana abortion clinic and other supporters of legal abortion — don’t deny that the state can ban abortion as a result of the Supreme Court ruling. But they have managed to buy time for Louisiana’s three abortion clinics, in Shreveport, Baton Rouge and New Orleans, to stay open while they argue that the current law is unconstitutionally vague.
The plaintiffs say the law has multiple, conflicting trigger mechanisms. They also argue that state law is unclear on whether it bans an abortion prior to a fertilized egg implanting in the uterus.
Joanna Wright, an attorney for the north Louisiana abortion clinic that filed the suit, argues that an “ordinary citizen should be able to look” at the statutes and know what is permitted.
In addition, the law provides an exception for “medically futile” pregnancies in cases of fetuses with fatal abnormalities, the plaintiffs noted it gives no definition of the term and that state health officials have not yet provided a list of conditions that would qualify as medically futile.
With the list of exemptions nonexistent, Wright said doctors are left “paralyzed” and trying to make sense of what situations “count” as an exception for abortion in order to avoid prosecution and criminal punishment.
Landry’s office argues that the state ban is constitutional and should no longer be blocked. Landry, in a filing last week, argued that the law “needs only to delineate what is illegal — not define what is legal.” John Balhoff, an attorney representing Landry, argued that the terms are clear and defined.
The lawsuit originated in New Orleans, where a judge issued a temporary order blocking enforcement of the ban June 27. Nearly two weeks later, a second New Orleans judge sent the case to Baton Rouge, saying state law required that it be heard in the capital. That move, in effect, ended the initial restraining order.
But Johnson issued a second temporary restraining order July 11.
Associated Press writers Kevin McGill in New Orleans and Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.
As your daily newspaper, we are committed to providing you with important local news coverage for Sullivan County and the surrounding areas.